On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 2:19 PM, Jeff Johnston <[email protected]> wrote:
> Talked to Andrew who is at FSOSS. He agrees with the 0.10.0 solution and > is ok with back-leveling the nightly updates. We cannot go 1.0.0 while we > are in Incubation. > > Francois, I can make these changes unless you have already started. > > Be my guest :-) > -- Jeff J. > > > On 10/28/2011 01:34 PM, Francois Chouinard wrote: > >> I guess it doesn't hurt to mark them as 0.10 for now. Nothing prevents >> us from updating before Juno if we are happy with the APIs. >> >> >> On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Alexander Kurtakov <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> On 20:25:35 Friday 28 October 2011 Jeff Johnston wrote: >> > Actually, I just realized I am mistaken regarding the next >> release part >> > of this. Our 0.9.1 release will be an Indigo update and built >> from the >> > stable-0.9 branch, not master. So, Alex, are we fine marking our >> Juno >> > milestone builds as 1.0.0 or should we have waited until our final >> > milestone? >> >> Personally, I would prefer if we mark them as 0.10 until we are >> really sure we >> can sign by these API. >> What others think? >> >> Alex >> >> > >> > -- Jeff J. >> > >> > On 10/28/2011 12:50 PM, Jeff Johnston wrote: >> > > Hi Francois, >> > > >> > > In working on the Juno build, I noticed that you bumped up >> Profiling, >> > > Callgraph, and Valgrind to 1.0.0 as well as the main pom.xml as >> part of >> > > following the releng wiki. 1.0.0 is a special version number. >> The actual >> > > next release should be 0.9.1. >> > > >> > > Alex, can we down-grade these on the nightly update site? It >> would mean >> > > any user that managed to update from there would have to >> uninstall and >> > > re-update to see any updates in the next bit. I can rebuild this >> > > afternoon. >> > > >> > > -- Jeff J. >> > > ______________________________**_________________ >> > > linuxtools-dev mailing list >> > > [email protected] >> <mailto:linuxtools-dev@**eclipse.org<[email protected]> >> > >> >> > > >> https://dev.eclipse.org/**mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-**dev<https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev> >> > >> > ______________________________**_________________ >> > linuxtools-dev mailing list >> > [email protected] >> <mailto:linuxtools-dev@**eclipse.org<[email protected]> >> > >> >> > >> https://dev.eclipse.org/**mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-**dev<https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev> >> ______________________________**_________________ >> linuxtools-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> <mailto:linuxtools-dev@**eclipse.org<[email protected]> >> > >> >> https://dev.eclipse.org/**mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-**dev<https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Francois >> >> >> ______________________________**_________________ >> linuxtools-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://dev.eclipse.org/**mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-**dev<https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev> >> > > ______________________________**_________________ > linuxtools-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://dev.eclipse.org/**mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-**dev<https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev> > -- Francois
_______________________________________________ linuxtools-dev mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev
