----- Original Message ----- > From: "Wainer dos Santos Moschetta" <waine...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > To: linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org > Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2012 3:09:01 PM > Subject: Re: [linuxtools-dev] Linux Tools 0.9.1 Build > > On 01/19/2012 10:47 AM, Otávio Pontes wrote: > > On 01/19/2012 10:16 AM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote: > >> > >> > >> ----- Original Message ----- > >>> From: "Wainer dos Santos Moschetta"<waine...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > >>> To: linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org > >>> Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2012 1:55:36 PM > >>> Subject: Re: [linuxtools-dev] Linux Tools 0.9.1 Build > >>> > >>> Jeff, > >>> > >>> What if merge RDT branch (only common remote infra) for 0.9.1? Do > >>> you > >>> think doable? > >> > >> 0.9.1 is supposed to be pure bugfix release and this doesn't sound > >> like one. > >> If you feel like there is a need for new release with new > >> functionality in it we can always do > >> 0.10 before June. > > Oh, sure, makes sense. > > >> > > > > What is expected for June? 1.0? > > > > Releases with new functionality require release review and pmc > > approval so if we try to do such thing > >> it will slow down the 0.9.1 release and make it miss the SR2 > >> deadline. > >> Sorry if I misunderstood smth. > > > > What about releasing Perf and the RDT branch in a 0.10 release? Is > > the > > process of creating a new release complicated? I can help you if > > you > > want in that. Can't we do 0.10 and 0.9.1 in parallel? So that we > > can > > do 0.9.1 before the deadline. > > Just an complement of Otávio's thoughts: we are eager to consume Perf > and RDT branch but we can't wait until June so, from our side it is > really desired an 0.10 release. Thanks Otávio for kindly volunteer to > help on this release! > > Our team is working/thinking on solutions for remote Valgrind, RPM, > Oprofile, Perf (plans for the future) and Autotools (actually, only > testing integration with PTP of Jeff's work) with assumption that > Jeff's > RDT branch will be merged in near future and also will become the > common > infrastructure for remote enablement of Linux Tools plug-ins. > > Perf is already into the master branch. We have sent fixes but there > is > more to be done (e.g. an user guide plug-in).
Having 0.10 before June is perfectly fine (actually I expected it). Please consider that it takes few weeks to get the iplog approved and etc. and start a new mail thread proposing having 0.10 release and some date for it. Once there is agreement about it details won't be a problem. Alex > > > > > > >> > >> Alex > >> > >>> > >>> - Wainer > >>> > >>> On 01/18/2012 09:06 PM, Jeff Johnston wrote: > >>>> I am going to make a 0.9.1 build for SR2. It will include the > >>>> p2.inf > >>>> changes to automatically add our update site that weren't in the > >>>> 0.9.0 > >>>> release plus the moving of the dataviewer classes to their own > >>>> feature. > >>>> > >>>> Do not make any changes to the stable-0.9 branch. > >>>> > >>>> Regards, > >>>> > >>>> -- Jeff J. > >>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>> linuxtools-dev mailing list > >>>> linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org > >>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev > >>>> > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> linuxtools-dev mailing list > >>> linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org > >>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev > >>> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> linuxtools-dev mailing list > >> linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org > >> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev > >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > > linuxtools-dev mailing list > > linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org > > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev > > > > _______________________________________________ > linuxtools-dev mailing list > linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev > _______________________________________________ linuxtools-dev mailing list linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev
