On Fri, Feb 1, 2019 at 9:09 PM Roland Grunberg <rgrun...@redhat.com> wrote:
> A long while ago, I filed CQs for dockerfile-language-server-nodejs [1] > and Dockerfile.tmLanguage [2] in order to consider using the generic > editor (lsp4e + tm4e) to have editing capabilities for Dockerfile > files. This was to replace the existing Dockerfile editor and benefit > from improvements made upstream at > > https://github.com/rcjsuen/dockerfile-language-server-nodejs/ > > This work exists and was ready to be pushed, but the one remaining > issue was that dockerfile-language-server-nodejs had many dependencies > that also needed to be shipped in the plugin and Type_B CQs didn't seem > possible. With Type_A, which only requires license certification this > seems like a possibility, so with the new CQ, these would require us to > change Linux Tools to a Type_A project. [3] > > Curious on people's thoughts. This should at least reduce the > maintenance load associated with updating the Dockerfile editor plugin, > as the support for the format would be delegated to the nodejs module. > +1 for the move to Type A project. > > Cheers, > -- > Roland Grunberg > > [1] https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14080 > [2] https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14397 > [3] https://www.eclipse.org/projects/handbook/#ip-faq > > _______________________________________________ > linuxtools-dev mailing list > linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org > To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe > from this list, visit > https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev >
_______________________________________________ linuxtools-dev mailing list linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev