On Fri, Feb 1, 2019 at 9:09 PM Roland Grunberg <rgrun...@redhat.com> wrote:

> A long while ago, I filed CQs for dockerfile-language-server-nodejs [1]
> and Dockerfile.tmLanguage [2] in order to consider using the generic
> editor (lsp4e + tm4e) to have editing capabilities for Dockerfile
> files. This was to replace the existing Dockerfile editor and benefit
> from improvements made upstream at
>
> https://github.com/rcjsuen/dockerfile-language-server-nodejs/
>
> This work exists and was ready to be pushed, but the one remaining
> issue was that dockerfile-language-server-nodejs had many dependencies
> that also needed to be shipped in the plugin and Type_B CQs didn't seem
> possible. With Type_A, which only requires license certification this
> seems like a possibility, so with the new CQ, these would require us to
> change Linux Tools to a Type_A project. [3]
>
> Curious on people's thoughts. This should at least reduce the
> maintenance load associated with updating the Dockerfile editor plugin,
> as the support for the format would be delegated to the nodejs module.
>

+1 for the move to Type A project.


>
> Cheers,
> --
> Roland Grunberg
>
> [1] https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14080
> [2] https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14397
> [3] https://www.eclipse.org/projects/handbook/#ip-faq
>
> _______________________________________________
> linuxtools-dev mailing list
> linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org
> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe
> from this list, visit
> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev
>
_______________________________________________
linuxtools-dev mailing list
linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from 
this list, visit
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev

Reply via email to