That sounds good. Thanks Jeff.

Jonah


On Wed., Nov. 25, 2020, 21:24 Jeff Johnston, <jjohn...@redhat.com> wrote:

>
> I have switched Linux Tools target to use the RC1 Orbit repo and to
> specify the 9.0.0 versions of objectweb.asm.  It was
> specifying 8.1.0 for M3.  Looking at a local build repository, there are
> only objectweb.asm 9.0.0 plug-ins.  Docker Tooling
> is working in my testing.
>
> Is there something else needed or should that fix the issue foir RC1?
>
> -- Jeff J.
>
> On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 5:29 PM Jonah Graham <jo...@kichwacoders.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Because of changes in simrel (Orbit p2 repo is directly available to
>> simrel[1]) ASM 9 is being used by Linuxtools for 2020-12 M3 simrel and EPP,
>> but ASM 8 is being used if you install linuxtools outside of Simrel.
>>
>> If ASM9 does not work, changing Linuxtools target platform alone won't
>> change what ends up being resolved. We probably need to update
>> the com.github.jnr.ffi bundle in Orbit and normally Orbit publishes its RC2
>> around the same time Linuxtools publishes its RC1.
>>
>> [1] https://git.eclipse.org/r/c/simrel/org.eclipse.simrel.build/+/172825
>>
>> Jonah
>>
>>
>> On Wed., Nov. 25, 2020, 16:39 Jeff Johnston, <jjohn...@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>> The orbit repo for Linux Tools wasn't updated since M1, but that was an
>>> oversight.  We can update for RC1 to use the latest and greatest orbit
>>> (RC1).   If there
>>> are issues and we have to back-level any packages, I'll post here.
>>>
>>> -- Jeff J.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 3:49 PM Jonah Graham <jo...@kichwacoders.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello Linux tools folks,
>>>>
>>>> I have been continuing to unravel dependencies, especially about
>>>> version constraints. Most of my work has been on JAXB because some uses
>>>> cases of JAXB is failing since 2020-06.
>>>>
>>>> While doing so I came across another case which only affects
>>>> Linuxtools' docker support.
>>>>
>>>> At the moment docker tooling depends on com.github.jnr set of bundles,
>>>> which in turn depends on org.objectweb.asm. However the dependency only
>>>> specifies a lower bound of 8.0.1 [1]. There is now a 9.x version in Orbit,
>>>> but linuxtools builds against an older orbit.
>>>>
>>>> Does it matter to Linuxtools which version of ASM is pulled in?
>>>>
>>>> [1]
>>>> https://git.eclipse.org/r/c/orbit/orbit-recipes/+/162989/2/github/jnr/com.github.jnr.ffi_2.1.12/osgi.bnd
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>> Jonah
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ~~~
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> linuxtools-dev mailing list
>>>> linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org
>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
>>>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> linuxtools-dev mailing list
>>> linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org
>>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
>>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> linuxtools-dev mailing list
>> linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org
>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev
>>
> _______________________________________________
> linuxtools-dev mailing list
> linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org
> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev
>
_______________________________________________
linuxtools-dev mailing list
linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org
To unsubscribe from this list, visit 
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev

Reply via email to