It DOES NOT infringe on M$ look and feel. They just say it does. This has not been decided legally or by the IT community as a whole. It looks different, enough, to me ::grin::.
On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 12:53 AM, Roger E. Rustad, Jr. <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 10:51 PM, Chris Penn <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Here just a copy of Windows, office not include: >> http://bit.ly/5YPEHg >> >> No Serial code needed! > > LOL > > Actually, this brings up some interesting grey areas... > > Is this "bad" because it infringes on MS's "look and feel"? Or is it bad > because (in my opinion) consumers didn't get what they thought that they > paid for. > > I'd love to get a copy and actually look at it and see how well they copied > everything and at what point you could tell that it was Ubuntu under the > hood. > > _______________________________________________ > LinuxUsers mailing list > [email protected] > http://socallinux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linuxusers > > -- "As we open our newspapers or watch our television screens, we seem to be continually assaulted by the fruits of Mankind's stupidity." -Roger Penrose _______________________________________________ LinuxUsers mailing list [email protected] http://socallinux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linuxusers
