On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 9:03 PM, Peter Hutterer <peter.hutte...@who-t.net> wrote: > applied, but from a cursory glance I'm not sure why. In fact, I would have > guessed the other way round. anyway, I've added a comment to avoid this in > the future (at least until we find the reason why and fixed it). > > Cheers, > Peter > I thought it was curious as well. I tried things both ways around and was surprised to see that this was the order that worked.
Jason --- Day xee-nee-svsh duu-'ushtlh-ts'it; nuu-wee-ya' duu-xan' 'vm-nvshtlh-ts'it. Huu-chan xuu naa~-gha. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Enable your software for Intel(R) Active Management Technology to meet the growing manageability and security demands of your customers. Businesses are taking advantage of Intel(R) vPro (TM) technology - will your software be a part of the solution? Download the Intel(R) Manageability Checker today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmar _______________________________________________ Linuxwacom-devel mailing list Linuxwacom-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxwacom-devel