12.01.2012 04:25, Peter Hutterer kirjoitti: > Trawling through my xorg bugs yesterday I found a few that were filed > against the Input/wacom component at bugs.freedesktop.org. This was created > ages ago, when Ping and I were talking about moving the driver over to > freedesktop.org in general. We decided to stay with sf.net in the end to > avoid too big a break for our users (this discussion happened ~2 years ago > or so) > > However, given sf's issue tracker moving to the freedesktop.org bugzilla > seems quite tempting. I personally find the issue tracker horrible. > There are a few advantages in using bugs.freedesktop.org: > - bugzilla is somewhat of a standard when it comes to bugreporting > - cross-referencing/reassigning bugs is easier between other components such > as the X server > - tighter integration with xorg in general. X.org hackers tend to look at > the bugzilla, they don't look at our sf page. > - better references: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/12345 vs > > http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3456195&group_id=69596&atid=525124 > > Disadvantages: > - this should only be done for the xf86-input-wacom component (and xsetwacom > bugs), kernel bugs should not go there (or at least would require a > different component). > - users would need to create a user account separate from sf.net > - technically off-site (I doubt that matters) > > And other things I missed. What's the general feeling on it?
As a distro maintainer: yes please. would libwacom have a component of it's own? t ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ RSA(R) Conference 2012 Mar 27 - Feb 2 Save $400 by Jan. 27 Register now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev2 _______________________________________________ Linuxwacom-devel mailing list Linuxwacom-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxwacom-devel
