Hi Terry On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 3:04 AM, Terry Manderson <terry.mander...@icann.org> wrote:
> They are: > > * Finish the deployment document > * Get the two security documents done > * Get an operational document at least started, which should include > cache management and ETR synchronization techniques. > * Either in the second security document, or in complementary documents we > need to evaluate the security threat to cache maintenance, and > evaluate the applicability and coverage we get from a reuse of SIDR > technology. > > Is anything not represented here that you believe necessary? and conversely > is there something here that is out of scope in your eyes? > > Are there work areas not covered by the draft below which you believe should > be? > Are there any interest to look further into to future and discuss what is needed to have a long term solution of LISP, as discussed in RFC 1955? This scheme could be extended to not require globally unique IP address. Effectively the combination of AD-Address and IP-Address is the globally unique address. To use this scheme without globally unique IP-Addresses and without changing in the hosts would require a NAT mechanism in the border routers. I think it would be preferable to change the hosts to have them do the DNS query and add the AD- header. This could be the basis for the long term solution. Another interesting aspect of this scheme is that if we were to relax the current architecture where one IP-Address is always in only one AD, to allow an IP-Address to be in more than one AD, it would provide a solution to the issue of allowing a IP entity to get service from more than one service provider. Patrick _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list lisp@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
