Since we are in last call and these are simple changes, I think they should go in.
Dino > On Oct 27, 2014, at 7:08 AM, Lori Jakab <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > Well structured and written document, with the right balance between brevity > and detail. > > A few small nits, which can be fixed in a later update: > - The last paragraph of the introduction refers to the “LISP specifications” > in plural and lists a single reference. I think it should read “LISP > specification”. > - First paragraph of Section 3 s/inetrworking/interworking/ Same in Section > 3.5 > - I think someone already mentioned this in a previous review, I would > replace dashes with parentheses when used like this: "typically -but not > limited to- an IPv4 or IPv6 address” > - Right before Section 3.4.3.1 s/LISP-ALT and LISP+DDT/LISP+ALT and LISP-DDT/ > > -Lori > >> On Oct 25, 2014, at 3:03 PM, Luigi Iannone <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> All, >> >> A lot of work has been done lately on draft-ietf-lisp-introduction-07 and >> the authors requested a work group last call. >> >> This email starts a WG last call, to end November 14th, 2014. >> >> You will find the document here: >> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-lisp-introduction-07 >> >> Please review this WG document. Let the working group know if you agree >> that it is ready for handing to the AD, or if you see issues with it. >> If you see issues, please be as specific as possible about the problems, and >> if possible suggest text to resolve them. >> >> Joel & Luigi >> _______________________________________________ >> lisp mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp > > _______________________________________________ > lisp mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
_______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
