Agree with Victor and Dino. Chad Hintz Technical Solutions Architect Commercial East Area
Cisco Systems, Inc. United States Cisco.com Phone: +1-716-446-5312 chahi...@cisco.com CCIE - 15729 Twitter:@chadh0517Blog:dcnextgen.blogspot.com "Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication" -Leonardo da Vinci <http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/l/leonardo_da_vinci.html> On 12/22/14, 12:43 PM, "Victor Moreno (vimoreno)" <vimor...@cisco.com> wrote: >+ 1 > >Victor > >> On Dec 22, 2014, at 10:51 AM, Dino Farinacci <farina...@gmail.com> >>wrote: >> >> I like option (1) and think the document should be adopted. >> >> Dino >> >>> On Dec 22, 2014, at 7:12 AM, Joel M. Halpern <j...@joelhalpern.com> >>>wrote: >>> >>> To amplify Luigi's comment, we have several choices: >>> 1) We can use this document as the basis for the working group action >>>to address the milestone. >>> 2) We can use something else as a basis for working group action to >>>address the milestone. >>> 3) We can go fight about whether this matters because we don't want to >>>do this. >>> >>> If you like option (1), tell us you want the document adopted. >>> If you like option (2), please say so and give us some idea of what >>>"different" looks like. Best if you offer to provide a draft by a >>>date, but even just a paragraph or two on what "different" is would >>>help us understand your opposition. >>> If you like (3), please explain. That path seems likely to waste more >>>time than producing a good document. Particularly since we have what >>>looks to the chairs like a very good start on this deliverable. >>> >>> Speak up, please. >>> >>> Yours, >>> Joel >>> >>>> On 12/22/14 10:08 AM, Luigi Iannone wrote: >>>> Hi All, >>>> >>>> the two weeks have elapsed since the beginning of the WG Adoption Call >>>> for draft-saucez-lisp-impact-07. >>>> >>>> There was actually very little reaction on this call. >>>> >>>> Silence does not help to make a decision, one way or another. >>>> >>>> Recall that our charter explicitly state that we will work on "A >>>> description of the impacts of LISP². >>>> >>>> The WG Adoption Call is extended for another two weeks (until 5th >>>> January 2015). >>>> >>>> Please take this opportunity to express your opinion on this document. >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> >>>> Luigi & Joel >>>> >>>>> On 04 Dec 2014, at 12:27, Luigi Iannone <g...@gigix.net >>>>> <mailto:g...@gigix.net>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi All, >>>>> >>>>> During the 91st IETF authors of the draft-saucez-lisp-impact-07 >>>>> [https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-saucez-lisp-impact-07] >>>>> asked for WG adoption. Meeting participants expressed consensus on >>>>> adoption. >>>>> >>>>> This message begins the two weeks call for WG adoption to confirm the >>>>> meeting outcome. >>>>> The call ends on December 19th 2014. >>>>> >>>>> Please respond to the LISP mailing list with any statements of >>>>> approval or disapproval. >>>>> >>>>> Recall that: >>>>> >>>>> - This is not WG Last Call. The document is not final, and the WG is >>>>> expected to >>>>> modify the document¹s content until there is WG consensus that the >>>>> content is solid. >>>>> Therefore, please don¹t oppose adoption just because you want to see >>>>> changes to its content. >>>>> >>>>> - If you have objections to adoption of the document, please state >>>>> your reasons why, >>>>> and explain what it would take to address your concerns. >>>>> >>>>> - If you have issues with the content, by all means raise those >>>>>issues >>>>> and we can >>>>> begin a dialog about how best to address them. >>>>> Luigi and Joel >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> lisp mailing list >>> lisp@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp >> >> _______________________________________________ >> lisp mailing list >> lisp@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp > >_______________________________________________ >lisp mailing list >lisp@ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list lisp@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
