Hi, I support option #1.
-Lori On 12/22/2014 05:12 PM, Joel M. Halpern wrote: > To amplify Luigi's comment, we have several choices: > 1) We can use this document as the basis for the working group action to > address the milestone. > 2) We can use something else as a basis for working group action to > address the milestone. > 3) We can go fight about whether this matters because we don't want to > do this. > > If you like option (1), tell us you want the document adopted. > If you like option (2), please say so and give us some idea of what > "different" looks like. Best if you offer to provide a draft by a date, > but even just a paragraph or two on what "different" is would help us > understand your opposition. > If you like (3), please explain. That path seems likely to waste more > time than producing a good document. Particularly since we have what > looks to the chairs like a very good start on this deliverable. > > Speak up, please. > > Yours, > Joel > > On 12/22/14 10:08 AM, Luigi Iannone wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> the two weeks have elapsed since the beginning of the WG Adoption Call >> for draft-saucez-lisp-impact-07. >> >> There was actually very little reaction on this call. >> >> Silence does not help to make a decision, one way or another. >> >> Recall that our charter explicitly state that we will work on "A >> description of the impacts of LISP”. >> >> The WG Adoption Call is extended for another two weeks (until 5th >> January 2015). >> >> Please take this opportunity to express your opinion on this document. >> >> Thanks >> >> Luigi & Joel >> >>> On 04 Dec 2014, at 12:27, Luigi Iannone <g...@gigix.net >>> <mailto:g...@gigix.net>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi All, >>> >>> During the 91st IETF authors of the draft-saucez-lisp-impact-07 >>> [https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-saucez-lisp-impact-07] >>> asked for WG adoption. Meeting participants expressed consensus on >>> adoption. >>> >>> This message begins the two weeks call for WG adoption to confirm the >>> meeting outcome. >>> The call ends on December 19th 2014. >>> >>> Please respond to the LISP mailing list with any statements of >>> approval or disapproval. >>> >>> Recall that: >>> >>> - This is not WG Last Call. The document is not final, and the WG is >>> expected to >>> modify the document’s content until there is WG consensus that the >>> content is solid. >>> Therefore, please don’t oppose adoption just because you want to see >>> changes to its content. >>> >>> - If you have objections to adoption of the document, please state >>> your reasons why, >>> and explain what it would take to address your concerns. >>> >>> - If you have issues with the content, by all means raise those issues >>> and we can >>> begin a dialog about how best to address them. >>> Luigi and Joel >>> >>> >> > > _______________________________________________ > lisp mailing list > lisp@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list lisp@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
