Dino, In this case, couldn't we use the pair <site-id, IID> to identify xTRs that form a multihoming group? Or we'd need some extra identifier? Do you see a case when we have xTRs using different site-ids but providing L2 multihoming to a common group of endpoints?
Thanks, Marc On 11/12/21, 1:33 PM, "lisp on behalf of Dino Farinacci" <[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote: Luigi made this suggestion at the working group. You cannot use site-id because all the L2 sites are part of the same L2 network need the same value. And instance-ID is the only value that can be used since it is in the encapsulated header. You need to use instance-ID so multi-tenancy can be used. Because each site can be part of multiple VLANs which may partially reside in other sites (i.e. site-id A has VLANS (1,2,3), but site-id B has VLANS (1,2) and site-id C has VLANs (1,3)) Dino _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
