> In this case, couldn't we use the pair <site-id, IID> to identify xTRs that > form a multihoming group? Or we'd need some extra identifier?
There is no point. Then you would have to store n site-ids for no use. > Do you see a case when we have xTRs using different site-ids but providing L2 > multihoming to a common group of endpoints? That is a misconfiguration, if it is one host. Otherwise the MAC EID moved to a new site. Doesn’t matter what the site-id is in the move case, you know from a new RLOC registered. Dino _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
