Hi Dino, Before I hit sent I did search the draft and did not find any match on QUIC :(
But to your question - yes. I see no reason why LISP control plane could not be running over QUIC. Best, R. On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 7:59 PM Dino Farinacci <[email protected]> wrote: > The draft indicates QUIC can be used as a reliable transport. But are you > saying QUIC should be used for all LISP messages? > > Dino > > > On Apr 22, 2022, at 6:35 AM, Robert Raszuk <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > May I ask for reasons not to use QUIC instead of home made UDP based > transport followed by TCP ? > > > > Many thx, > > Robert > > > > On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 9:42 AM Luigi Iannone <[email protected]> wrote: > > All, > > > > During the last LISP WG meeting in Vienna/Meetecho the authors of the > draft: > > > > LISP Map Server Reliable Transport > > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-kouvelas-lisp-map-server-reliable-transport/ > > > > Asked for adoption as WG document. > > Call for adoption during the meeting showed clear consensus. > > This email is the usual procedure to confirm the consensus on the > mailing list. > > > > If anybody has concerns about adopting this document please state so on > the mailing list before May 5th 2022. > > Please also argument the technical reason why you have concerns. > > > > Ciao > > > > Luigi & Joel > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > lisp mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp > > _______________________________________________ > > lisp mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp > >
_______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
