I am actually referring to the case where the control plane during the handoff registers new RLOC while the active/old one still works. Nothing to do with the data plane.
That is what I meant by "radio overlap". Then there will be time where more then one RLOC is active and the old one can get pruned after the new one is tested as working fine. Would that not be a better overall option ? R. On Sat, Apr 23, 2022 at 10:51 PM Dino Farinacci <[email protected]> wrote: > > I would rather describe it as "You are here and there in the same time" > :) so the switchover is seamless and does not require to put any stress on > the control plane. > > Right. > > > In my view it should be the most often (if not the only one) mode of > operation during RLOCs handovers. > > Well, there is a big tradeoff the user has to make. If they want near-0 > packet loss at the expense of sending more data packets, then they use > predictive-RLOCs. If they don't need mind the handoff latency, then the > control-plane mechanism is sufficient. > > Dino > > >
_______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
