Hi Luigi, Dino See below PPE
Thanks Padma > On Mar 15, 2023, at 02:03, Luigi Iannone <g...@gigix.net> wrote: > > Hi Dino, > >>> On 14 Mar 2023, at 20:35, Dino Farinacci <farina...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> LISP Mobility: candidate document LISP-MN but does not solve everything >>> should we enlarge the scope? >> >> draft-ietf-lisp-eid-mobility as well. > > Right. We can have a general discussion about mobility and what kind of > documents we need. > Would lisp-mn and lisp-end-mobility be sufficient? Are there any other use > cases? PPE- should we consider predictive rlocs draft as well? It covers predictive mobility. >> >>> LISP Yang Model: We are pretty close to finish this one >>> LISP NAT Traversal: we have a candidate document >> >> And VPNs are in charter and used quite a lot in LISP deployments, so >> draft-ietf-lisp-vpn. > > Good point. > >> >> Alternative Mapping System Design is part of the charter and the only draft >> that is pending is draft-farinacci-lisp-decent but not sure this needs to be >> standardized. >> >> And we need to decide the outcome of draft-ietf-lisp-te and control-plane >> security such as draft-ietf-lisp-ecdsa-auth and draft-ietf-eid-anonymity. >> I'm not sure they need to be standards track. >> > > They can still be experimental if WG is willing to publishing them. The > charter may include a security/privacy work item and these documents would be > covered. > > Ciao > > L. > > > >> Dino >> > _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list lisp@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
