Reviewer: Rich Salz Review result: Serious Issues This is a very short draft that adds "names" to LISP identifiers.
Major nit: Why is ASCII used for names rather than UTF-8? Related, no mention of punycode as a UTF8 alternative. If UTF8 was considered and then rejected as not needed, there should probably be a justfication for that decision in the document. A document which is part of a system "which are intended to replace most use of IP addresses" that limits names to the ASCII character set should not be approved. Minor nit: "Distinguished Name" has a long history with X.509 certificates and I could not get past my confusion. Is another name possible? Okay if the answer is no. _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list -- lisp@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to lisp-le...@ietf.org
