> Reviewer: Rich Salz > Review result: Serious Issues Thanks for your comments Rich.
> This is a very short draft that adds "names" to LISP identifiers. > > Major nit: Why is ASCII used for names rather than UTF-8? Related, no mention > of punycode as a UTF8 alternative. If UTF8 was considered and then rejected as > not needed, there should probably be a justfication for that decision in the > document. This came up in the working group and we just decided ASCII was sufficient. And since implementations lead the draft we didn't want to obsolete them or create a compatibility issue. > A document which is part of a system "which are intended to replace most use > of > IP addresses" that limits names to the ASCII character set should not be > approved. > > Minor nit: "Distinguished Name" has a long history with X.509 certificates and > I could not get past my confusion. Is another name possible? Okay if the > answer is no. We had to inherit that name since we decided to use AFI=17. Dino _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list -- lisp@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to lisp-le...@ietf.org
