Thanks for the response Luigi. And for those who were not around at the time, Luigi was there from the start when LISP was born from the IETF Routing RG back in the 2006-2009 time frame.
Dino > On Jun 6, 2025, at 5:24 AM, Luigi Iannone <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > Just answering on the “experimental” status of the document. > > >>> On 5 Jun 2025, at 22:34, Dino Farinacci <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Deb Cooley has also a good point about what it the experiment scope, >>> duration, >>> and evaluation. >> >> Working group chairs or AD please respond!!! > > There are two things to consider: > > 1. As for RFC2026: The "Experimental" designation typically denotes a > specification that > is part of some research or development effort. > > This document is part of a development effort to include geo-coordinates in > LISP. Is not part of qn experiment, as not all experimental RFC are > necessarily part of an experiment. It is about the maturity level of the > technology. > > 2. The history of LISP. > > Long story short, LISP was born as a big experiment and the WG chartered only > to produce informational and experimental documents. With the deployment > experience gathered through the years, the LISP WG has rechartered to move > the most mature peices of LISP to STD Track, but not all the pieces. > > That is the reason why this document is “Experimental”. > > Hope this clarifies the point. > > Ciao > > L. _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
