On Fri, May 01, 1998 at 09:00:14AM -0400, murr rhame wrote: > On Thu, 30 Apr 1998, Rich Kulawiec wrote: > > > Name three. > > > > I would expect that any such answer would (a) name the mailing lists > > explicitly and (b) explain who they are run by and that person(s)'s > > level of knowledge and (c) provide adequate justification for why > > they should be considered "the most valuable lists on the internet". > > An essay exam? [plonk] Two out of three of your criteria are > completely subjective. [...] They're not my criteria. They're Ron's. I simply gave my take on what an answer would look like -- and I could easily be wrong, since I was interpreting what Ron had to say. For an authoritative answer, I suggest you ask him. ---Rsk Rich Kulawiec [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: Prevalence of mailing-list bombing Ronald F. Guilmette
- Re: Prevalence of mailing-list bombing Jeff Wasilko
- Re: Prevalence of mailing-list bombin... murr rhame
- Re: Prevalence of mailing-list b... Ronald F. Guilmette
- Re: Prevalence of mailing-list bombing Olusegun O. Ogidan
- Re: Prevalence of mailing-list bombin... Mike Nolan
- Re: Prevalence of mailing-list bombin... Rich Kulawiec
- Re: Prevalence of mailing-list bombing Jason Rasku
- Re: Prevalence of mailing-list bombing Rich Kulawiec
- Re: Prevalence of mailing-list bombin... murr rhame
- Re: Prevalence of mailing-list b... Rich Kulawiec
- Re: Prevalence of mailing-list b... Rich Kulawiec
- Re: Prevalence of mailing-list b... Norbert Bollow
- Re: Prevalence of mailing-list b... Ronald F. Guilmette
- Re: Prevalence of mailing-list b... Norbert Bollow
- Re: Prevalence of mailing-list b... Ronald F. Guilmette
- Re: Prevalence of mailin David B. Smith
- Re: Prevalence of mailin Chuq Von Rospach
- Re: Prevalence of mailing-list bombing Olwen Williams
- Re: Prevalence of mailing-list bombing Ronald F. Guilmette
- Re: Prevalence of mailing-list bombing Olwen Williams
