A correction to my own note: On Fri, May 01, 1998 at 09:49:16AM -0400, Rich Kulawiec wrote: > They're not my criteria. They're Ron's. I simply gave my take on > what an answer would look like -- and I could easily be wrong, since I > was interpreting what Ron had to say. For an authoritative answer, > I suggest you ask him. Actually, they belong to Norbert Bollow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, who made the statement in question. Ron merely asked him to name three which satisfied the criteria...which neither he nor anyone else has, yet. ---Rsk Rich Kulawiec [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: Prevalence of mailing-list bombing Jeff Wasilko
- Re: Prevalence of mailing-list bombin... murr rhame
- Re: Prevalence of mailing-list b... Ronald F. Guilmette
- Re: Prevalence of mailing-list bombing Olusegun O. Ogidan
- Re: Prevalence of mailing-list bombin... Mike Nolan
- Re: Prevalence of mailing-list bombin... Rich Kulawiec
- Re: Prevalence of mailing-list bombing Jason Rasku
- Re: Prevalence of mailing-list bombing Rich Kulawiec
- Re: Prevalence of mailing-list bombin... murr rhame
- Re: Prevalence of mailing-list b... Rich Kulawiec
- Re: Prevalence of mailing-list b... Rich Kulawiec
- Re: Prevalence of mailing-list b... Norbert Bollow
- Re: Prevalence of mailing-list b... Ronald F. Guilmette
- Re: Prevalence of mailing-list b... Norbert Bollow
- Re: Prevalence of mailing-list b... Ronald F. Guilmette
- Re: Prevalence of mailin David B. Smith
- Re: Prevalence of mailin Chuq Von Rospach
- Re: Prevalence of mailing-list bombing Olwen Williams
- Re: Prevalence of mailing-list bombing Ronald F. Guilmette
- Re: Prevalence of mailing-list bombing Olwen Williams
- Re: Prevalence of mailing-list bombing Lazlo Nibble
