On Tue, Jan 26, 1999 at 10:18:17AM +0100, Ivan Pope wrote:
> >If you have some evidence to support your claim that sysadmins refuse mail
> >from people for no reason, please present it.
>
> We were put on the Paul Vixie black list system and had all traffic from
> our mailservers blocked into the US by a US ISP that used the list as a
> reference. This had a major effect on our service, as the ISP was the
> supplier into the US for our ISP.
> What was our crime? Someone used one of our client addresses as a _return_
> address on a piece of spam.
I hardly think that providing a safe home for spammers to collect responses to
their spam is "no reason" for refusing to connect to your system. By offering
a drop box, your site was actively assisting these lowlifes in their abuse of
the network. Why should people feel obligated to help you help the spammers
by connecting to you?
--
Lazlo Nibble - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.studio-nibble.com
--
- Re: Yet another virus alert Ronald F. Guilmette
- Re: Yet another virus alert Ivan Pope
- Re: Yet another virus alert Ronald F. Guilmette
- Re: Yet another virus alert David W. Tamkin
- Re: Yet another virus alert Ronald F. Guilmette
- Re: Yet another virus alert Ivan Pope
- Re: Yet another virus alert Ronald F. Guilmette
- Re: Yet another virus alert Mike Nolan
- Re: Yet another virus alert Mitch Collinsworth
- diseconomies of spam Richard Kay
- Re: Yet another virus alert Lazlo Nibble
- Re: Yet another virus alert Brent Sims
- Re: Yet another virus alert Lazlo Nibble
- Re: Yet another virus alert Chuq Von Rospach
- Re: Yet another virus alert Ken D.
- Re: Yet another virus alert Ronald F. Guilmette
- Re: Yet another virus alert Brent Sims
- Re: Yet another virus alert Bob Brown
- Re: Yet another virus alert Chuq Von Rospach
- Re: Yet another virus alert Ronald F. Guilmette
- Re: Yet another virus alert Chuq Von Rospach
