I'm curious how well the "agreement" would hold up in court. As far as I know, an author doesn't relinquish their copyright just because they post an item to a mailing list. I don't believe you can force someone to accept an agreement by making a one-sided declaration. If the subscribers have not formally accepted the proposal, how can it be binding? As an extreme example of this principle, if I declare that by reading this article, you now owe me $1,000,000.00US should I expect payment? No court would attempt to enforce my million dollar proposal unless I had formal proof that someone accepted my deal. - murr -
- eGroup - What's with the clause? matthew . simpson
- Re: eGroup - What's with the clause? SRE
- Re: eGroup - What's with the clause? Chuq Von Rospach
- Re: eGroup - What's with the clause? Bernie Cosell
- Re: eGroup - the Sanity Clause... Tim Bowden
- Re: eGroup - the Sanity Clause... John R Levine
- Re: eGroup - the Sanity Clause... murr rhame
- Re: eGroup - the Sanity Claus... Tim Bowden
- Re: eGroup - the Sanity ... murr rhame
- Re: eGroup - the San... Tim Bowden
- Re: eGroup - the San... Chuq Von Rospach
- Re: eGroup - the Sanity ... Chuq Von Rospach
- Re: eGroup - the Sanity Claus... Tim Pierce
- Re: eGroup - the Sanity ... Ernie Longmire/Lazlo Nibble
- Re: eGroup - the San... Istvan Berkeley
- Re: eGroup - the... Chuq Von Rospach
- Re: eGroup - the... John R Levine
