murr rhame <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm curious how well the "agreement" would hold up in court. As > far as I know, an author doesn't relinquish their copyright just > because they post an item to a mailing list. Say you sold an article to Scanlog, the print monthly. Then in a few months, whathell, you decided you wanted to sell it to Mosca, too. Should you be able to do that freely? Is Scanlog acting tyrannical in insisting they be the only forum for that particular contracted segment? They provided you with a stage; what rights accrue from that benefit? mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tim Bowden) Proud member of NERDNOSH (tm)! mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] org the command: subscribe nerdnosh
- eGroup - What's with the clause? matthew . simpson
- Re: eGroup - What's with the clause? SRE
- Re: eGroup - What's with the clause? Chuq Von Rospach
- Re: eGroup - What's with the clause? Bernie Cosell
- Re: eGroup - the Sanity Clause... Tim Bowden
- Re: eGroup - the Sanity Clause... John R Levine
- Re: eGroup - the Sanity Clause... murr rhame
- Re: eGroup - the Sanity Claus... Tim Bowden
- Re: eGroup - the Sanity ... murr rhame
- Re: eGroup - the San... Tim Bowden
- Re: eGroup - the San... Chuq Von Rospach
- Re: eGroup - the Sanity ... Chuq Von Rospach
- Re: eGroup - the Sanity Claus... Tim Pierce
- Re: eGroup - the Sanity ... Ernie Longmire/Lazlo Nibble
- Re: eGroup - the San... Istvan Berkeley
- Re: eGroup - the... Chuq Von Rospach
- Re: eGroup - the... John R Levine
- Re: eGroup - the... Chuq Von Rospach
