On Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 12:41:08PM -0700, Chuq Von Rospach wrote: > At 1:53 PM -0500 10/26/00, David W. Tamkin wrote: > > >What about the compromise of a To: line like this: > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (via the Foo Mailing List) > > It allows filtering, but not replying, a key issue with discussion > lists. Have any of the proponents of to-header munging considered how replies to the list will be handled? Are you going to move the list's address to the Cc: header or something? -- Regards, Tim Pierce RootsWeb.com lead system admonsterator and Chief Hacking Officer
- Re: elist address or your address in messa... Jim Trigg
- Re: elist address or your address in m... Chuq Von Rospach
- Re: elist address or your address... Jim Trigg
- Re: elist address or your add... Chuq Von Rospach
- Re: elist address or your add... Bernie Cosell
- Re: elist address or your add... Chuq Von Rospach
- Re: elist address or your add... Bernie Cosell
- Re: elist address or your add... John R Levine
- Re: elist address or your add... David W. Tamkin
- Re: elist address or your add... Chuq Von Rospach
- Re: elist address or your add... Tim Pierce
- Re: elist address or your add... Chuq Von Rospach
- Re: elist address or your add... Tim Pierce
- Re: elist address or your add... David W. Tamkin
- Re: elist address or your add... Aaron Schrab
- Re: elist address or your add... Paul Hoffman / IMC
- Re: elist address or your add... Chuq Von Rospach
- PINE Filtering /& Subj... Paul K-
- Re: elist address or your address in message TO header SRE
- Re: elist address or your address in message TO he... James M Galvin
- Re: elist address or your address in message T... Russ Allbery
