Tim wrote, | Have any of the proponents of to-header munging considered how | replies to the list will be handled? Are you going to move the | list's address to the Cc: header or something? Actually, a Cc: header to the list was something I was thinking about when I posted it. Then is a reply-all would address the previous poster, the list, and the respondent him/herself; without the Cc: header it would go to the previous poster and the respondent. One thing overlooked in this discussion -- or maybe one person mentioned it in passing -- is that lists that clobber To: to point to each member often clobber From: to name the list there; that takes care of replying but makes private replies impossible unless the poster supplies his/her address in the text. In light of RFC2369 it would be nice if MUAs learned about List-Post:.
- Re: elist address or your add... Chuq Von Rospach
- Re: elist address or your add... Bernie Cosell
- Re: elist address or your add... Chuq Von Rospach
- Re: elist address or your add... Bernie Cosell
- Re: elist address or your add... John R Levine
- Re: elist address or your add... David W. Tamkin
- Re: elist address or your add... Chuq Von Rospach
- Re: elist address or your add... Tim Pierce
- Re: elist address or your add... Chuq Von Rospach
- Re: elist address or your add... Tim Pierce
- Re: elist address or your add... David W. Tamkin
- Re: elist address or your add... Aaron Schrab
- Re: elist address or your add... Paul Hoffman / IMC
- Re: elist address or your add... Chuq Von Rospach
- PINE Filtering /& Subj... Paul K-
- Re: elist address or your address in message TO header SRE
- Re: elist address or your address in message TO he... James M Galvin
- Re: elist address or your address in message T... Russ Allbery
- Re: elist address or your address in message TO he... Chuq Von Rospach
- Re: elist address or your address in message TO header Rich Kulawiec
