At 2:45 PM -0600 12/10/00, Mike Nolan wrote: >One approach to this would be to rate limit non-member addresses >differently than list member addresses, I suppose. just use a geometric backoff. the more often a person sends a command, the longer you wait to fill it. After it's been quiet for a period of time, reset the timer. That way you don't hose over someone who asks for the info file and immediately trashes it by mistake and asks for another, but you do limit the damage you do if a luser decides to use your system as a guided missile. or actually, the way it's used, a mortar.. -- Chuq Von Rospach - Plaidworks Consulting (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) Apple Mail List Gnome (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) We're visiting the relatives. Cover us.
- Re: Is mailback validation still safe? Chuq Von Rospach
- Re: Is mailback validation still safe? Paul Hoffman / IMC
- Re: Is mailback validation still safe? Tim Pierce
- Re: Is mailback validation still safe? Chuq Von Rospach
- Re: Is mailback validation still safe? Tim Pierce
- Re: Is mailback validation still safe? Chuq Von Rospach
- Re: Is mailback validation still safe? SRE
- Re: Is mailback validation still safe? Mike Nolan
- Re: Is mailback validation still safe? Bernie Cosell
- Re: Is mailback validation still safe? murr rhame
- Re: Is mailback validation still safe? Chuq Von Rospach
- Re: Is mailback validation still safe? David W. Tamkin
- Re: Is mailback validation still safe? Chuq Von Rospach
- Re: Is mailback validation still safe? Chuq Von Rospach
- Re: Is mailback validation still safe? Chuq Von Rospach
- Re: Is mailback validation still safe? Margaret Levine Young
- Re: Is mailback validation still safe? murr rhame
- Re: Is mailback validation still safe? Margaret Levine Young
- Re: Is mailback validation still safe? J C Lawrence
