At 3:30 PM -0600 12/10/00, David W. Tamkin wrote: >I find it more depressing than impressing. It's also unsurprising. there are commercial servers out there that don't follow the basic tenets of the RFCs. it's not just the MUA (and in general, MLMs do pretty well) -- but one need only look at, oh, First Class, which insists on sending errors back to the original poster and ignores envelope info (including Errors to), or Lotus, where, god help me, someone decided that the "return receipt" should be a system configured item by the admin. And compound that with the "never upgrade" problem, and it gets even nastier. -- Chuq Von Rospach - Plaidworks Consulting (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) Apple Mail List Gnome (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) We're visiting the relatives. Cover us.
- Re: Is mailback validation still safe? Chuq Von Rospach
- Re: Is mailback validation still safe? Tim Pierce
- Re: Is mailback validation still safe? Chuq Von Rospach
- Re: Is mailback validation still safe? SRE
- Re: Is mailback validation still safe? Mike Nolan
- Re: Is mailback validation still safe? Bernie Cosell
- Re: Is mailback validation still safe? murr rhame
- Re: Is mailback validation still safe? Chuq Von Rospach
- Re: Is mailback validation still safe? David W. Tamkin
- Re: Is mailback validation still safe? Chuq Von Rospach
- Re: Is mailback validation still safe? Chuq Von Rospach
- Re: Is mailback validation still safe? Chuq Von Rospach
- Re: Is mailback validation still safe? Margaret Levine Young
- Re: Is mailback validation still safe? murr rhame
- Re: Is mailback validation still safe? Margaret Levine Young
- Re: Is mailback validation still safe? J C Lawrence
