At 03:02 -0500 2/28/2001, murr rhame wrote: >You can keep the subscriber list on an announcement or anonymous >posting list fairly safe if you run the list on a machine that >you own. Indeed. But if what a small company decides to move its subscribers to, say, a Yahoo-based list without asking the subscribers first? They may not feel comfortable with such a move given less local control, and isn't there then more reason to worry about leakage? At 00:21 -0800 2/28/2001, Chuq Von Rospach wrote: >But admins who are worried about leakage should do what companies have done >for years: salt your data. You can subscribe AOL, or hotmail, or yahoo, or >(name your favorite free email) names that are ONLY used for the specific >purpose of trapping leakage. The problem, of course, is that those addresses >can (and do) leak in other ways
- Re: Confidentiality of member files - copyright James M Galvin
- Re: Confidentiality of member files - copyright Sharon Tucci
- RE: Confidentiality of member files - copyright Nigel Horne
- Re: Confidentiality of member files - copyright SRE
- Re: Confidentiality of member files - copyright Bernie Cosell
- Re: Confidentiality of member files - copyright SRE
- Re: Confidentiality of member files - copyright David Sharp
- Re: Confidentiality of member files - copyright murr rhame
- Re: Confidentiality of member files - copyright Chuq Von Rospach
- Re: Confidentiality of member files - copyright J C Lawrence
- Re: Confidentiality of member files - copyright Mikael Hansen
- Re: Confidentiality of member files - copyright Chuq Von Rospach
- Re: Confidentiality of member files - copyright murr rhame
- Re: Confidentiality of member files - copyright Ashton MacAndrews
