At 07:35 AM 3/7/01, you wrote:
> >Rumor has it that AOL has posted instructions on the web on how
> >to make AOL 6.0 send plain text messages.  In my mind this is
> >a good thing because it now permits AOL customers to once again
> >send commands to the ListProc command processor that Cornell University
> >uses.
>
>I'm left scratching my head wondering why system administrators feel unable
>or unwilling to put a filter on the front end which will convert HTML
>encoded text to plain text. It's not hard.

It's not hard *for system administrators*.  For list administrators who are 
not system administrators, it's impossible.  System administrators, 
however, have to do it on a case by case basis as requested by the list 
administrators (or be willing to undo it on a case by case basis as 
requested by the list administrators), since some lists might allow or even 
encourage HTML encoded text.  (One set of mailing lists I run is a set of 
distribution lists for a monthly letter in various formats -- RTF, 
WordPerfect, HTML, and ASCII.  The users have a choice of what formats to 
subscribe to.)

>There have been bitter battles fought by purists who feel it is
>inappropriate to send HTML encoded emails. I'm inclined to agree. But now

It is inappropriate to send HTML encoded emails *unless* the recipient has 
agreed in advance to receive them.

Jim Trigg


Reply via email to