Amy Stinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am not a lawyer. I am suggesting that those of you who offer list
> hosting services that allow adult topics get with an attorney and
> look into this matter. I'm also suggesting that those of you who run
> adult oriented lists do the same.
At one time in the seventies, apparently the Supremes were on a path to
separate text from graphics in pornography rulings. I had always
thought smut related to pictures since then. Do you think a text-based
forum would be a target?
I believe it's a conspiracy by geneticists in our gumint to avoid overly
exciting and thus provoking the birth rate of illiterates. Therefore,
they always go for closing down the dirty pictures.
Shortsighted of them. They should realize the illiterates have devised
a perfect counterbalance to retain equanimity in pop culture. All the
graphic violence inspires activity to keep the drooler population under
control.
I'm not really a lawyer either, nor a social comentator, but I play both
on NerdNosh.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tim Bowden)
"Readers meeting Writers as the Sea the Very Sky"
Send: subscribe nerdnosh To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
