Re: AOL Terms -- Revealed

[murr rhame]

On Sat, 28 Apr 2001, David W. Tamkin wrote:

> Murr Rhame wrote,
> 
> | Reducing the number of recipients per-email doesn't help. ...

> But was it dropped because of a screwup by AOL, or was it
> dropped because of these policies?  

I can't say if the email was dropped due to a general failure or
due to filtering.  I can say that reducing the recipients to ONE
does NOT yield reliable mailing list delivery to AOL.  Our server
is set for a max of 30 simultaneous sends.

> It's not that you are comparing apples with oranges so much
> as that you might be comparing rotted apples with poisoned
> apples.

Yup.


- murr -