> > In this case, I don't blame them a bit. Most of the stuff > > their anti-spam rules rejects is indeed spam... > > How do you know that they are rejecting more spam than legitimate > mailing list traffic? >From private discussions with people who run AOL's mail service. They're quite sophisticated and really do know the difference between legit mailing lists and spam, even if their lawyers don't. Regards, John Levine, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.abuse.net, Trumansburg NY abuse.net postmaster
- Re: AOL Terms -- Revealed J C Lawrence
- Re: AOL Terms -- Revealed murr rhame
- Re: AOL Terms -- Revealed Roger Burton West
- Re: AOL Terms -- Revealed John R Levine
- Re: AOL Terms -- Revealed J C Lawrence
- Re: AOL Terms -- Revealed Adam Bailey
- Re: AOL Terms -- Revealed Adam Bailey
- Re: AOL Terms -- Revealed murr rhame
- Re: AOL Terms -- Revealed Alan Clegg
- Re: AOL Terms -- Revealed murr rhame
- Re: AOL Terms -- Revealed John R Levine
- Re: AOL Terms -- Revealed Russ Allbery
- Re: AOL Terms -- Revealed Charlie Summers
- Re: AOL Terms -- Revealed Bernie Cosell
- Re: AOL Terms -- Revealed John R Levine
- Re: AOL Terms -- Revealed Steve Werby
- Re: AOL Terms -- Revealed Chuck Rice
- Re: AOL Terms -- Revealed Nick Simicich
- Re: AOL Terms -- Revealed Adam Bailey
- Re: AOL Terms -- Revealed Russ Allbery
- Re: AOL Terms -- Revealed Adam Bailey
