> I've often wondered if it was practical to create a list of "Certified > Non-Spammers." If you think about it that's what AOL is doing, but in > their case it's for private use. Certifying mailing lists and mailing list providers turns out to be a rather complicated problem, particularly when you have large lists and mailing houses that mail for third parties. I'm a director of a company called whitehat.com that provides that service for a fee, and I just don't see how a shoestring automated system could do a credible job. Regards, John Levine, [EMAIL PROTECTED], Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies", Information Superhighwayman wanna-be, http://iecc.com/johnl, Sewer Commissioner Finger for PGP key, f'print = 3A 5B D0 3F D9 A0 6A A4 2D AC 1E 9E A6 36 A3 47
- we aren't the enemy, but it's hard to prove it Tom Neff
- Re: we aren't the enemy, but it's hard to prove it James M Galvin
- Re: we aren't the enemy, but it's hard to prove it Tom Neff
- Re: we aren't the enemy, but it's hard to prove it Chuq Von Rospach
- Re: we aren't the enemy, but it's hard to prove it Tom Neff
- Re: we aren't the enemy, but it's hard to prove it murr rhame
- Re: we aren't the enemy, but it's hard to prove it John R Levine
- Re: we aren't the enemy, but it's hard to prove it Tom Neff
- Re: we aren't the enemy, but it's hard to prove it Chuq Von Rospach
- Re: we aren't the enemy, but it's hard to prov... James M Galvin
- Re: we aren't the enemy, but it's hard to prove it James M Galvin
- Re: we aren't the enemy, but it's hard to prove it David W. Tamkin
- Re: we aren't the enemy, but it's hard to prove it John R Levine
- RE: we aren't the enemy, but it's hard to prov... Rick Rountree
- Re: we aren't the enemy, but it's hard to prove it J C Lawrence
- Re: we aren't the enemy, but it's hard to prove it Mitch Collinsworth
- Re: we aren't the enemy, but it's hard to prove it Chuq Von Rospach
