list-managers  

Messages by Date

• 2001/05/31 Re: Cute new hoax Chuq Von Rospach
• 2001/05/31 Re: Cute new hoax Paul Hoffman / IMC
• 2001/05/31 Re: test messages etc J C Lawrence
• 2001/05/31 Re: Cute new hoax Margaret Levine Young
• 2001/05/31 Re: Cute new hoax Roger B.A. Klorese
• 2001/05/31 Re: Cute new hoax JC Dill
• 2001/05/31 Re: Cute new hoax murr rhame
• 2001/05/31 Re: Cute new hoax Chuq Von Rospach
• 2001/05/31 Cute new hoax William Silvert
• 2001/05/30 Re: test messages etc John R Levine
• 2001/05/30 Re: test messages etc Tim Pierce
• 2001/05/30 Re: list to honey.. J C Lawrence
• 2001/05/30 Re: test messages etc Tim Pierce
• 2001/05/30 Re: user unknown with error 450? Chuq Von Rospach
• 2001/05/30 Re: test messages etc J C Lawrence
• 2001/05/30 Re: test messages etc Chuq Von Rospach
• 2001/05/30 Re: test messages etc J C Lawrence
• 2001/05/30 Re: test messages etc Chuq Von Rospach
• 2001/05/30 Re: user unknown with error 450? Chuq Von Rospach
• 2001/05/30 Re: test messages etc J C Lawrence
• 2001/05/30 Re: list to honey.. Norbert Bollow
• 2001/05/30 Re: test messages etc Chuq Von Rospach
• 2001/05/30 Re: test messages etc J C Lawrence
• 2001/05/30 Re: test messages etc Tim Pierce
• 2001/05/30 Re: test messages etc Nick Simicich
• 2001/05/29 Re: test messages etc JC Dill
• 2001/05/29 Re: test messages etc J C Lawrence
• 2001/05/29 Re: test message,or reply's to, which worse? JC Dill
• 2001/05/29 Re: protecting archives from harvesters David W. Tamkin
• 2001/05/29 Re: test message,or reply's to, which worse? David W. Tamkin
• 2001/05/29 Re: test messages etc Nick Simicich
• 2001/05/29 Re: protecting archives from harvesters (was test messages) Nick Simicich
• 2001/05/29 Re: protecting archives from harvesters (was test messages) JC Dill
• 2001/05/29 Re: protecting archives from harvesters (was test messages) Aumont
• 2001/05/29 Re: test message,or reply's to, which worse? J C Lawrence
• 2001/05/29 Re: test message,or reply's to, which worse? Roger Fajman
• 2001/05/29 Re: test message,or reply's to, which worse? Roger Fajman
• 2001/05/29 Re: test message,or reply's to, which worse? J C Lawrence
• 2001/05/28 Re: list to honey.. J C Lawrence
• 2001/05/28 Re: protecting archives from harvesters (was test messages) Tim Pierce
• 2001/05/28 Re: protecting archives from harvesters (was test messages) Chuq Von Rospach
• 2001/05/28 Re: protecting archives from harvesters (was test messages) Chuq Von Rospach
• 2001/05/28 Re: protecting archives from harvesters (was test messages) JC Dill
• 2001/05/28 Re: test message,or reply's to, which worse? JC Dill
• 2001/05/28 Re: protecting archives from harvesters (was test messages) Paul Hoffman / IMC
• 2001/05/28 Re: protecting archives from harvesters (was test messages) Chuq Von Rospach
• 2001/05/28 Re: list to honey.. Paul Hoffman / IMC
• 2001/05/28 Re: test message,or reply's to, which worse? David W. Tamkin
• 2001/05/28 Re: test message,or reply's to, which worse? David W. Tamkin
• 2001/05/28 Re: protecting archives from harvesters (was test messages) David W. Tamkin
• 2001/05/28 list to honey.. albert
• 2001/05/28 Re: test message,or reply's to, which worse? J C Lawrence
• 2001/05/28 YES ! dual active replys..this is my quest... albert
• 2001/05/28 Re: test messages etc Chuq Von Rospach
• 2001/05/28 Re: test message,or reply's to, which worse? Bernie Cosell
• 2001/05/28 Re: test message,or reply's to, which worse? David W. Tamkin
• 2001/05/28 Re: test message,or reply's to, which worse? J C Lawrence
• 2001/05/28 Re: test message,or reply's to, which worse? JC Dill
• 2001/05/28 Re: test messages etc Roger Burton West
• 2001/05/28 Re: test messages etc Bernie Cosell
• 2001/05/28 Re: test message,or reply's to, which worse? J C Lawrence
• 2001/05/28 Re: test message,or reply's to, which worse? Chuq Von Rospach
• 2001/05/28 Re: test messages etc Chuq Von Rospach
• 2001/05/28 Re: test message,or reply's to, which worse? David W. Tamkin
• 2001/05/28 Re: test messages etc Tom Neff
• 2001/05/28 Re: Reply-To and usability measurements Chuq Von Rospach
• 2001/05/27 Reply-To and usability measurements Norbert Bollow
• 2001/05/27 Re: test message,or reply's to, which worse? Keith Flippin
• 2001/05/26 Re: test message,or reply's to, which worse? Chuq Von Rospach
• 2001/05/26 Re: lets forget the silly test,...and , Mike Yuhas
• 2001/05/26 lets forget the silly test,...and , albert
• 2001/05/26 Re: test message,or reply's to, which worse? JC Dill
• 2001/05/26 Re: test message,or reply's to, which worse? Michael C. Berch
• 2001/05/26 Re:test message,or reply's to, which worse? Charlie Summers
• 2001/05/26 Re: test message,or reply's to, which worse? David W. Tamkin
• 2001/05/26 test message,or reply's to, which worse? albert
• 2001/05/25 Re: filtering (was Re: test) Chuq Von Rospach
• 2001/05/25 filtering (was Re: test) Keith Flippin
• 2001/05/25 configuation pointer needed. albert
• 2001/05/25 Re: test Nick Simicich
• 2001/05/25 No Subject albert
• 2001/05/25 test albert
• 2001/05/23 user unknown with error 450? Chuq Von Rospach
• 2001/05/22 Re: Fw: Spam Filters vs. Mailing Lists Mikael Hansen
• 2001/05/22 More on: Spam Filters vs. Mailing Lists William Silvert
• 2001/05/21 Re: Fw: Spam Filters vs. Mailing Lists Chuq Von Rospach
• 2001/05/21 Re: Fw: Spam Filters vs. Mailing Lists Nick Simicich
• 2001/05/21 Re: Spam Filters vs. Mailing Lists Tim Pierce
• 2001/05/21 Fw: Spam Filters vs. Mailing Lists William Silvert
• 2001/05/20 Re: Spam Filters vs. Mailing Lists Charlie Summers
• 2001/05/20 Re: Spam Filters vs. Mailing Lists Stephanie da Silva
• 2001/05/20 Re: Spam Filters vs. Mailing Lists Charlie Summers
• 2001/05/20 Re: Spam Filters vs. Mailing Lists Roger B.A. Klorese
• 2001/05/20 Re: Spam Filters vs. Mailing Lists Charlie Summers
• 2001/05/20 Re: Spam Filters vs. Mailing Lists Bernie Cosell
• 2001/05/19 Re: Spam Filters vs. Mailing Lists Tim Pierce
• 2001/05/19 Re: Spam Filters vs. Mailing Lists David W. Tamkin
• 2001/05/19 Re: Spam Filters vs. Mailing Lists JC Dill
• 2001/05/19 Re: Spam Filters vs. Mailing Lists J C Lawrence
• 2001/05/19 Re: Spam Filters vs. Mailing Lists Roger B.A. Klorese
• 2001/05/19 Re: Spam Filters vs. Mailing Lists Chuq Von Rospach
• 2001/05/19 Re: Spam Filters vs. Mailing Lists Nick Simicich
• 2001/05/19 Fw: Spam Filters vs. Mailing Lists William Silvert
• 2001/05/19 Re: Spam Filters vs. Mailing Lists Tom Coradeschi
• 2001/05/19 Re: Spam Filters vs. Mailing Lists Bernie Cosell
• 2001/05/19 Re: Spam Filters vs. Mailing Lists Russ Allbery
• 2001/05/18 Re: Spam Filters vs. Mailing Lists Roger B.A. Klorese
• 2001/05/18 Re: Spam Filters vs. Mailing Lists Chuq Von Rospach
• 2001/05/18 Re: Spam Filters vs. Mailing Lists Chuq Von Rospach
• 2001/05/18 Re: Spam Filters vs. Mailing Lists Chuq Von Rospach
• 2001/05/18 Re: Spam Filters vs. Mailing Lists Chuq Von Rospach
• 2001/05/18 Re: Spam Filters vs. Mailing Lists Tim Pierce
• 2001/05/18 Re: Spam Filters vs. Mailing Lists Tim Pierce
• 2001/05/18 Re: Spam Filters vs. Mailing Lists Tim Pierce
• 2001/05/18 Re: Spam Filters vs. Mailing Lists Chuq Von Rospach
• 2001/05/18 Re: Spam Filters vs. Mailing Lists David W. Tamkin
• 2001/05/18 Re: Spam Filters vs. Mailing Lists Roger B.A. Klorese
• 2001/05/18 Re: Spam Filters vs. Mailing Lists Bernie Cosell
• 2001/05/18 Re: Spam Filters vs. Mailing Lists Nick Simicich
• 2001/05/18 Re: Spam Filters vs. Mailing Lists Chuq Von Rospach
• 2001/05/18 Spam Filters vs. Mailing Lists William Silvert
• 2001/05/12 For your amusement... Chuq Von Rospach
• 2001/05/09 Re: Yahho's [apparent] decision to drop Adult groups Alvin Oga
• 2001/05/09 Re: Yahho's [apparent] decision to drop Adult groups Joe Smith
• 2001/05/08 Re: autoresponders and vacation notices (was: senate.gov problem) Roger Fajman
• 2001/05/08 Re: autoresponders and vacation notices (was: senate.gov problem) Nick Simicich
• 2001/05/08 Re: autoresponders and vacation notices (was: senate.gov problem) James M Galvin
• 2001/05/08 Re: autoresponders and vacation notices (was: senate.gov problem) Russ Allbery
• 2001/05/07 Re: autoresponders and vacation notices (was: senate.gov problem) Nick Simicich
• 2001/05/07 So called opt-in John R Levine
• 2001/05/06 Re: Mailing lists for -emarketing John R Levine
• 2001/05/06 Re: Mailing lists for -emarketing Larry Olin Horn
• 2001/05/06 Re: Mailing lists for -emarketing Jessica Callender
• 2001/05/05 Re: targeted spam (was mailing lists for e-marketing) David W. Tamkin
• 2001/05/05 Re: targeted spam (was mailing lists for e-marketing) Chuq Von Rospach
• 2001/05/05 targeted spam (was mailing lists for e-marketing) David W. Tamkin
• 2001/05/05 Re: Mailing lists for -emarketing JC Dill
• 2001/05/05 Re: Mailing lists for -emarketing Jessica Callender
• 2001/05/05 Re: autoresponders and vacation notices (was: senate.gov problem) James M Galvin
• 2001/05/05 causes of multiple messages [WAS: Re: senate.gov problem] Omar Thameen
• 2001/05/04 Re: autoresponders and vacation notices David W. Tamkin
• 2001/05/04 Re: senate.gov problem - update Sharon Tucci
• 2001/05/04 Re: autoresponders and vacation notices (was: senate.gov problem) Tim Pierce
• 2001/05/04 Re: senate.gov problem Tim Pierce
• 2001/05/04 Re: autoresponders and vacation notices (was: senate.gov problem) Sharon Tucci
• 2001/05/04 autoresponders and vacation notices (was: senate.gov problem) James M Galvin
• 2001/05/03 Re:Mailing lists for -emarketing Sharon Tucci
• 2001/05/03 Re:Mailing lists for -emarketing Margaret Levine Young
• 2001/05/03 Re:Mailing lists for -emarketing Charlie Summers
• 2001/05/03 Re: Mailing lists for -emarketing John R Levine
• 2001/05/03 Mailing lists for -emarketing Jessica Callender
• 2001/05/03 Re: senate.gov problem Nick Simicich
• 2001/05/03 Re: New mailing list host? J C Lawrence
• 2001/05/03 Re: senate.gov problem Sharon Tucci
• 2001/05/03 Re: senate.gov problem Sharon Tucci
• 2001/05/03 Re: senate.gov problem James M Galvin
• 2001/05/03 Re: senate.gov problem Chuq Von Rospach
• 2001/05/03 Re: New mailing list host? Bob Comperini
• 2001/05/03 senate.gov problem Sharon Tucci
• 2001/05/03 Re: we aren't the enemy, but it's hard to prove it Sharon Tucci
• 2001/05/03 Re: New mailing list host? Philip Busey
• 2001/05/03 Re: New mailing list host? Tom Coradeschi
• 2001/05/03 New mailing list host? Bob Comperini
• 2001/05/02 Re: Iname/mail.com effed up again? Chuq Von Rospach
• 2001/05/02 Re: Iname/mail.com effed up again? Nathan J. Mehl
• 2001/05/01 Re: we aren't the enemy, but it's hard to prove it James M Galvin
• 2001/05/01 Re: AOL Terms -- Revealed Norbert Bollow
• 2001/05/01 Re: we aren't the enemy, but it's hard to prove it Norbert Bollow
• 2001/04/30 Re: we aren't the enemy, but it's hard to prove it Chuq Von Rospach
• 2001/04/30 Re: we aren't the enemy, but it's hard to prove it JC Dill
• 2001/04/30 Re: AOL Terms -- Revealed Adam Bailey
• 2001/04/30 Re: we aren't the enemy, but it's hard to prove it Tom Neff
• 2001/04/30 Re: we aren't the enemy, but it's hard to prove it John R Levine
• 2001/04/30 Re: we aren't the enemy, but it's hard to prove it Stan Ryckman
• 2001/04/30 Re: AOL Terms -- Revealed Russ Allbery
• 2001/04/30 Re: we aren't the enemy, but it's hard to prove it JC Dill
• 2001/04/30 Re: we aren't the enemy, but it's hard to prove it Adam Bailey
• 2001/04/30 Re: we aren't the enemy, but it's hard to prove it Chuq Von Rospach
• 2001/04/30 RE: we aren't the enemy, but it's hard to prove it Rick Rountree
• 2001/04/30 Re: we aren't the enemy, but it's hard to prove it Mitch Collinsworth
• 2001/04/30 Re: AOL Terms -- Revealed Adam Bailey
• 2001/04/30 Re: we aren't the enemy, but it's hard to prove it J C Lawrence
• 2001/04/30 Re: AOL Terms -- Revealed Nick Simicich
• 2001/04/30 Re: we aren't the enemy, but it's hard to prove it John R Levine
• 2001/04/30 Re: we aren't the enemy, but it's hard to prove it David W. Tamkin
• 2001/04/30 Re: we aren't the enemy, but it's hard to prove it James M Galvin
• 2001/04/30 Re: we aren't the enemy, but it's hard to prove it Chuq Von Rospach
• 2001/04/30 Re: we aren't the enemy, but it's hard to prove it Tom Neff
• 2001/04/30 Re: we aren't the enemy, but it's hard to prove it John R Levine
• 2001/04/30 Re: we aren't the enemy, but it's hard to prove it murr rhame
• 2001/04/30 Re: we aren't the enemy, but it's hard to prove it James M Galvin
• 2001/04/30 Re: we aren't the enemy, but it's hard to prove it Tom Neff
• 2001/04/30 Re: we aren't the enemy, but it's hard to prove it Chuq Von Rospach
• 2001/04/30 Iname/mail.com effed up again? Chuq Von Rospach
• 2001/04/30 Re: we aren't the enemy, but it's hard to prove it Tom Neff
• 2001/04/30 Re: AOL Terms -- Revealed Chuck Rice
• 2001/04/30 Re: AOL Terms -- Revealed Steve Werby
• 2001/04/30 Re: we aren't the enemy, but it's hard to prove it James M Galvin
• 2001/04/30 Re: AOL Terms -- Revealed John R Levine
• 2001/04/30 we aren't the enemy, but it's hard to prove it Tom Neff

[Earlier messages] [Later messages]