On 03:01 AM 5/26/01, albert wrote: >And i also sent a question to this list asking for a little configuration >help, i got >a couple "smart comments" but not advice or help, the reply to the test got >more >response than a plea for help... Maybe next time you will reconsider the wisdom of sending a "test post". There is NO REASON for sending a test post. None. Ever. If you have something to post, post it. If you don't have something to post, there's no need to send a test post. jc
- test message,or reply's to, which worse? albert
- Re: test message,or reply's to, which worse? David W. Tamkin
- Re:test message,or reply's to, which worse? Charlie Summers
- Re: test message,or reply's to, which worse? Michael C. Berch
- Re: test message,or reply's to, which worse? JC Dill
- Re: test message,or reply's to, which worse? Chuq Von Rospach
- Re: test message,or reply's to, which worse? Keith Flippin
- Re: test message,or reply's to, which worse? David W. Tamkin
- Re: test message,or reply's to, which worse? Chuq Von Rospach
- Re: test message,or reply's to, which worse? J C Lawrence
- Re: test message,or reply's to, which worse? J C Lawrence
- Re: test message,or reply's to, which worse? JC Dill
- Re: test message,or reply's to, which worse? Bernie Cosell
- Re: test message,or reply's to, which worse? David W. Tamkin
- Re: test message,or reply's to, which worse? J C Lawrence
