On Thursday, August 15, 2002, at 12:08 AM, J C Lawrence wrote: > On Wed, 14 Aug 2002 15:24:12 -0700 > Michael C Berch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> It is definitely not either SpamAssassin or SpamBouncer, both of which >> merely mark up the message for later processing by Procmail or a MUA. >> Neither should be giving an error at the SMTP layer. > > SpamAssassin can be run at the MTA layer, providing hints to the MTA on > SPAM qualities at receipt time for immediate bouncing. This is not an > unusual configuration.
Oh... right! The spamass-milter. Forgot about that. It should not generate "Error 129", so far as I know, though. --MCB
