Those who manage mailing lists must certainly understand how the
written word can be read very differently by different people.
OK, I'm clear on the scope of this list. Since it does encompass any
and all kinds of list software, my original suggestion (from which we've
strayed a bit) becomes even more valid.
Many, if not most, day-to-day list maintenance issues are
software-specific. If posters would specify the software used, it would
avoid irrelevant questions like mine and save a lot of bandwidth from the
resulting tangential threads.
...Bob
- warning: spamming confirmed opt-in lists (fwd) nolan
- Re: warning: spamming confirmed opt-in lists (fwd) SRE
- List software (was: Re: warning: spamming confir... Bob Bish
- Re: List software (was: Re: warning: spammin... SRE
- Re: List software (was: Re: warning: spa... Bob Bish
- Re: List software (was: Re: warning... Charlie Summers
- Re: List software (was: Re: war... Bob Bish
- Re: List software (was: Re:... Tom Neff
- Re: List software (was: Re:... Bob Bish
- Re: List software (was: Re:... Vivek Khera
- Re: List software murr rhame
- Re: List software Tom Neff
- Re: List software Bob Bish
- Re: List software Barry A. Warsaw
- Off-list Revenge murr rhame
- Re: Off-list Revenge Tom Coradeschi
- Re: Off-list Revenge Chuq Von Rospach
- Re: List software Bob Bish
- Re: List software (was: Re: warning... Brent Chapman
