We are submitting each dynamic page using submittal software that spiders
the site and sends them one at a time 5 minutes apart. 

For a 100% dynamic site example, type this into any of the top 3 search
engines:  catv dallas

Each one will return a different sub-page of my clients site:
catvdallas.com

You'll see that everything runs through the index.cfm page.  I chose this
site because it has no meta tags or search engine optimization.  It is all
there because spiders can read dynamic content.

Of course I have clients that rank very high for their submittals for
standard websites.  

I also have a lot more clients that get good dynamic results, the best is
showbizjobs.com, search for:
entertainment jobs, universal jobs, Downey studios jobs

Jacob

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Kevin Fricke
Sent: Friday, December 17, 2004 9:46 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Search Engine Friendly URLs

Jacob,

Do you have some example sites?  I have still found this to be a problem.
Are you submitting each dynamic page or are the seach engines finding them?

Thanks!

Kevin

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Jacob Cameron
Sent: Friday, December 17, 2004 8:39 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Search Engine Friendly URLs


I personally think that it has not been an issue this century, and find the
effort an exercise in futility.  I do a lot of SEO and have clients with top
3 ranking using Fusebox style sites on MSN, Google, and Yahoo.

Jacob

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Jake
Sent: Friday, December 17, 2004 6:09 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Search Engine Friendly URLs

Thanks for the history. That puts all the pieces together I've heard
discussion about.

So do you think it's really that big of a deal these days to make the
/index.cfm/action/something syntax? Or is it just a legacy thing that people
hold onto more for nostalgia than for necessity?

Jake

Daniel Elmore wrote:

>The term "search engine safe" was coined in the early search engine 
>days because spiders would skip links with &'s and ?'s when indexing 
>your
site.
>The reason, AFAIK, was because the search engines didn't want to store 
>pages with dynamic content. Thinking it would degrade the accuracy of 
>keyword searches. This became a ridiculous idea as the web matured.
>Many static pages are generated dynamically and most pages that use 
>query strings are actually creating "static" content. A link to a 
>product description page for example. So to get around this people 
>started
writing links like so:
>http://www.mysite.com/index.cfm/action/something
>
>and then using a filter to convert the link. This fooled the spiders 
>into thinking it's a link to a page with static content. There are 
>plenty of web filters for the various middleware languages that allow 
>your web server to translate that url into the actual url.
>
>Things have slowly changed though and the spider bots are starting to 
>allow query strings with more and more attributes. So the value of the 
>web filters and the work involved to code your links like that is 
>degrading
rapidly.
>
>So in a nutshell, (I just realized that this tangent has not specially 
>answered your question) a search engine safe URL is constituted by 
>having a URL with no query string syntax (& and = and &).
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On 
>Behalf Of Jake
>Sent: Friday, December 17, 2004 2:07 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Search Engine Friendly URLs
>
>All,
>
>What is the consensus on what constitutes a "search engine safe" URL?
>Would something like:
>
>www.mysite.com/index.cfm?action=something
>
>or
>
>www.mysite.com/index.cfm?action=something&ID=190
>
>be SE safe?
>
>Jake
>
>----------------------------------------------------------
>To post, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe:
>   http://www.dfwcfug.org/form_MemberUnsubscribe.cfm
>To subscribe:
>   http://www.dfwcfug.org/form_MemberRegistration.cfm
>
>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------
>To post, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe:
>   http://www.dfwcfug.org/form_MemberUnsubscribe.cfm
>To subscribe:
>   http://www.dfwcfug.org/form_MemberRegistration.cfm
>
>
>
>
>
>

----------------------------------------------------------
To post, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe:
   http://www.dfwcfug.org/form_MemberUnsubscribe.cfm
To subscribe:
   http://www.dfwcfug.org/form_MemberRegistration.cfm




----------------------------------------------------------
To post, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe:
   http://www.dfwcfug.org/form_MemberUnsubscribe.cfm
To subscribe:
   http://www.dfwcfug.org/form_MemberRegistration.cfm


----------------------------------------------------------
To post, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: 
   http://www.dfwcfug.org/form_MemberUnsubscribe.cfm
To subscribe: 
   http://www.dfwcfug.org/form_MemberRegistration.cfm




----------------------------------------------------------
To post, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: 
   http://www.dfwcfug.org/form_MemberUnsubscribe.cfm
To subscribe: 
   http://www.dfwcfug.org/form_MemberRegistration.cfm


Reply via email to