>And further, ADR is available now, at the consent of both parties. Any >MANDATED ADR, where neither party can elect not to be a part of the ADR, is a >violation of their rights. >There is no need to mandate ADR, provisions for it exist on our laws already. The New York Stock Exchange's arbitration system would be an example of manadatory ADR held to be constitutional. __________________________________________________ To receive the digest version instead, send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To SUBSCRIBE forward this message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNSUBSCRIBE, forward this message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Problems/suggestions regarding this list? Email [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___END____________________________________________
- [ifwp] RE: Who is it that needs trademark protection? William X. Walsh
- [ifwp] RE: Who is it that needs trademark protect... Mikki Barry
- [ifwp] RE: Who is it that needs trademark protect... Martin B. Schwimmer
- [ifwp] RE: Who is it that needs trademark protect... Roeland M.J. Meyer
- [ifwp] RE: Who is it that needs trademark protect... Richard J. Sexton
- [ifwp] RE: Who is it that needs trademark protect... William X. Walsh
- [ifwp] RE: Who is it that needs trademark protect... Martin B. Schwimmer
- [ifwp] RE: Who is it that needs trademark protect... Milton Mueller
- [ifwp] RE: Who is it that needs trademark protect... Bill Lovell
- [ifwp] RE: Who is it that needs trademark protect... Martin B. Schwimmer
- [ifwp] RE: Who is it that needs trademark protect... Richard J. Sexton
- [ifwp] RE: Who is it that needs trademark protect... Martin B. Schwimmer
- [ifwp] RE: Who is it that needs trademark protect... William X. Walsh