At 02:12 PM 1/18/99 -0500, Mikki Barry wrote:
>Vint Cerf was right in his contention that trademark issues should NOT be a
>part of the DNS discussions. DNS discussions should be completed along
>technical lines, and the court system should be deciding issues of
>infringement. I know that if INTA and WIPO weren't involved with the
>current DNS discussions, I would happily find better things to do with my
>time rather than fight this battle.
There are exactly two things that got me started in this mess in the first
place
1) WIPO and DNS policy,
2) NSI trademark dispute policy.
Do you see a connection? The TLD thing is icing.
___________________________________________________
Roeland M.J. Meyer -
e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet phone: hawk.lvrmr.mhsc.com
Personal web pages: http://staff.mhsc.com/~rmeyer
Company web-site: http://www.mhsc.com
___________________________________________________
KISS ... gotta love it!
__________________________________________________
To receive the digest version instead, send a
blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To SUBSCRIBE forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNSUBSCRIBE, forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems/suggestions regarding this list? Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___END____________________________________________
