FYI:
Your comments are welcome on the ORSC policy list . . .
http://www.open-rsc.org/lists/
>Date: Wed, 20 Jan 1999 11:42:16 -0500
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>From: Jay Fenello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: The ORSC Delta
>
>
>Well, my eyes are a glazing . . .
>
>I've just finished reading (skimming) the
>multiple draft by-laws posted over the last
>couple of days. All in all, I'm encouraged.
>
>I found that every draft had at least one
>idea or concept that was consistent with the
>goals and ideals of ORSC. I also found some
>level of convergence between the drafts.
>
>Later this week, ORSC will likely have an
>opportunity to present our by-laws to the
>DNSO formation meetings in Washington.
>
>Given the large number of competing plans,
>and given the large number of areas that we
>already have some consensus, I suggest that
>we focus our presentations on the ORSC Delta.
>That is, what's *different* about our by-laws.
>
>My initial read is that ORSC differs in:
> - Organizational structure.
> - Fair Hearing Panels.
> - Proxies.
>
>What is your read?
>
>A discussion on this topic would be very
>helpful for those planning on attending the
>Washington meetings. Specifically, what do
>you consider to be the top three ORSC Deltas?
>Supporting comments welcome.
>
>Thanks in advance.
>
>Respectfully,
>
>Jay Fenello
>President, Iperdome, Inc.
>404-943-0524 http://www.iperdome.com
__________________________________________________
To receive the digest version instead, send a
blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To SUBSCRIBE forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNSUBSCRIBE, forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems/suggestions regarding this list? Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___END____________________________________________
