I believe this, and I don't think I have to join another list to prove
it.
Richard, if you can't handle HTML and can't figure out a way around
it, I'll write you a filter (at my normal billing rate <g>).
"Richard J. Sexton" wrote:
>
> At 10:13 AM 1/22/99 +0800, Dave Crocker wrote:
>
> >If one takes the view that one must only send what everyone is assured of
> >being able to process, then we will never have any upgrades. No MIME. No
> >HTML. No non-ASCII character sets. Etc.
>
> Go post HTML to the IETF list and see what happens if
> you really believe this crock.
>
> --
> "That's why there is a Protocol SO. To decide what the next
> number after 16 is." - Dixon (tinc)
>
> __________________________________________________
> To receive the digest version instead, send a
> blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> To SUBSCRIBE forward this message to:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, forward this message to:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Problems/suggestions regarding this list? Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ___END____________________________________________
--
Dan Steinberg
SYNTHESIS:Law & Technology
35, du Ravin
Box 532, RR1 phone: (613) 794-5356
Chelsea, Quebec fax: (819) 827-4398
J0X 1N0 e-mail:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
__________________________________________________
To receive the digest version instead, send a
blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To SUBSCRIBE forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNSUBSCRIBE, forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems/suggestions regarding this list? Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___END____________________________________________
