At 06:00 PM 1/22/99 -0500, you wrote:
>
> You'll get zero argument from me that NSI's dispute policy is unfair. In
> fact, DNRC was created as the direct result of NSI's dispute policy. And the
> expansion of that policy via WIPO is probably going to be even worse than
> NSI's policy. Between that, and the stated objectives of DNSO.org including
> "(3) other related subjects, including the relationship between the rights of
> trademark owners and the rights of domain name registrants" I am quite
> concerned that freedom of expression and other important concepts will be
> left by the wayside in the rush to protect trademark owners' rights at the
> expense of all else.
Right on all of the above!
>
> These issues should be settled by the courts, not by WIPO, not by a DNSO, not
> by ICANN, and certainly not by registries or registrars.
Right again. But how many clients have the money, or names like Interstellar
Starship
Services, Ltd., so that gluttons for punishment like me will represent them
against
MEGABUCKS, INC. ?
Bill Lovell
__________________________________________________
To receive the digest version instead, send a
blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To SUBSCRIBE forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNSUBSCRIBE, forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems/suggestions regarding this list? Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___END____________________________________________
