Jay writes:
> One issue that has not been adequately
> addressed is the change in balance on the
> ICANN BoD. The vision laid out in the
> White Paper does *not* include giving
> the president a vote on the BoD.
>
> This one change has a significant impact
> on the balance and flavor of the BoD. It
> should not be assumed to be correct, nor
> final.
Jay -
I have watched you valiantly attempting to interact with
Ms. Dyson and her ICANN collegues with no apparent success.
Your every effort is welcomed by even greater motion towards
isolation, reactivation of discredited pseudo-soutions and
even greater arrogance on the part of your wanna-be partners.
Isn't it time you faced up with the facts that tehy are not
dealing in good faith? Isn't it time to admit that all this
ICANN nonsense has been set up to install gTLD/POC/CORE/MoU
under a differant name and, this time, with the apparent
participation of yourself and the others on the BWG/ORSC?
Coffee. Time to. Wake up. And smell it.
Bob Allisat
Free Community Network _ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://fcn.net _ http://fcn.net/allisat
http://robin.fcn.net
__________________________________________________
To receive the digest version instead, send a
blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To SUBSCRIBE forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNSUBSCRIBE, forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems/suggestions regarding this list? Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___END____________________________________________
