Antony Van Couvering wrote:

> If that is not the model, however, and the DNSO is structured such that its
> decisions really can be said to represent the consensus of the whole DNSO,
> then the DNSO can do one other thing besides electing ICANN Board members --
> it can refuse to support ICANN decisions. 

What the DNSO can do is present itself as the successor to the IFWP,
and the legitimate NewCo, to the U.S. House Commerce Committee of
Tom Bliley in order to save initiative, free enterprise, free trade,
and competition on the Internet.

Reply via email to