Antony Van Couvering wrote: > If that is not the model, however, and the DNSO is structured such that its > decisions really can be said to represent the consensus of the whole DNSO, > then the DNSO can do one other thing besides electing ICANN Board members -- > it can refuse to support ICANN decisions. What the DNSO can do is present itself as the successor to the IFWP, and the legitimate NewCo, to the U.S. House Commerce Committee of Tom Bliley in order to save initiative, free enterprise, free trade, and competition on the Internet.
- Re: [IFWP] Timely decisions William X. Walsh
- Re: [IFWP] Timely decisions Dave Crocker
- Re: [IFWP] Timely decisions William X. Walsh
- Re: [IFWP] Timely decisions Dave Crocker
- Re: [IFWP] Timely decisions Michael Dillon
- Re: [IFWP] Timely decisions Dr Eberhard W Lisse
- [IFWP] DNSO Emergancy Powers = NC capture scenar... jeff Williams
- Re: [dnso.discuss] Re: [IFWP] Timely decisions Michael Sondow
- Re: [IFWP] Emergency DNS Policy Milton Mueller
- RE: [IFWP] Emergency DNS Policy Antony Van Couvering
- Re: [IFWP] Emergency DNS Policy Michael Sondow
- Re: [IFWP] Emergency DNS Policy Bret A. Fausett
- Re: [IFWP] Emergency DNS Policy Kent Crispin
- Re: [IFWP] Emergency DNS Policy Jay Fenello
- Re: [IFWP] Emergency DNS Policy Kent Crispin
- RE: [IFWP] Emergency DNS Policy Antony Van Couvering
- Re: [IFWP] Emergency DNS Policy Jay Fenello
- [IFWP] BMW Procedural Problems Antony Van Couvering
- Re: [IFWP] BMW Procedural Problems Kent Crispin