At 11:27 AM 2/15/99 -0800, Bill Lovell wrote: >At 02:49 AM 2/15/99 +00-04, you wrote: >> > >> >>As for *implementation, it seems like an ideal place to use XML. >> >What browsers/email packages now accommodate XML? Netscape and IE4 both do partial XML (different parts, of course). It is generally still considered experimental. ___________________________________________________ Roeland M.J. Meyer - e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet phone: hawk.lvrmr.mhsc.com Personal web pages: http://staff.mhsc.com/~rmeyer Company web-site: http://www.mhsc.com ___________________________________________________ KISS ... gotta love it!
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Trademarks vs DNS Richard J. Sexton
- [IFWP] Re: Trademarks vs DNS Kerry Miller
- RE: [IFWP] Re: Trademarks vs DNS William X. Walsh
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Trademarks vs DNS jeff Williams
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Trademarks vs DNS William X. Walsh
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Trademarks vs DNS jeff Williams
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Trademarks vs DNS William X. Walsh
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Trademarks vs ... Alex Kamantauskas
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Trademarks vs ... jeff Williams
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Trademarks vs DNS Bill Lovell
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Trademarks vs DNS Roeland M.J. Meyer
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Trademarks vs DNS Bill Lovell
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Trademarks vs DNS Roeland M.J. Meyer
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Trademarks vs DNS Bill Lovell
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Trademarks vs DNS Einar Stefferud
- [IFWP] Re: Trademarks vs DNS Kerry Miller
- [IFWP] Re: Trademarks vs DNS Kerry Miller
- RE: [IFWP] Re: Trademarks vs DNS William X. Walsh
- [IFWP] Re: Trademarks vs DNS Kerry Miller
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Trademarks vs DNS jeff Williams
- [IFWP] Re: Trademarks vs DNS Kerry Miller