>At 09:54 AM 2/26/99 -0500, you wrote:
>>>And if he was liable for infringement and misappropiation, he would have
>>>admitted that to you.
>>>
>>>The critical mind at work.
>>
>>You were talking about the "facts" Martin, not speculation, or your own
>>bias. The FACTS are that Adam Curry told me the same thing that Milton
>>stated.
>
>But what were you trying to establish by pointing out that you and Milton
>had heard the same version? is that proof of the accuracy of the account?
Try to remember the basics of trial practice. When a person gives the same
account to different unrelated individuals, it might just be the truth.
>
>While Curry was an employee of MTV, he registered the domain name in his
>own name, not in MTV's. That is undisputed. Go spin.
Of course, you conveniently cut out the rest of the post, which supported
the facts that Curry told Milton, myself, Richard Sexton, and others. But
I suppose that is to be expected from someone who seems to have placed
considerable professional brain power behind phrases like "go spin."
Your considerable attempts to belittle those who disagree with you
underscores the importance of maintaining freedoms in the domain name
system. It becomes clear that if people who use these types of tactics
gain control of the rules by which we register and use domain names, only
the MTVs of the world will be believed, despite the evidence to the
contrary. That is not a world view that I hold.
