I don't think PGMedia is a credible plaintiff, Jeff. I know you do (no
surprise there in light of, well, that subject is for another time).
A more credible plaintiff will have more support and be able to make a more
convincing and compelling case. And the appropriate defendent is not NSI,
Jeff, as PGMedia insists. They are going about it all wrong.
On 19-Mar-99 jeff Williams wrote:
> William and all,
>
> True enough. However by the same token it doesn't mean that the
> appeal won't either. Hence the reason for a court of appeals, william.
> In addition if there is more discovery, which is likely in this particular
> case there is a whole new case potentially.
>
> William X. Walsh wrote:
>
> > Doesn't mean the appeal has any more merit than the original case did.
> >
> > On 19-Mar-99 jeff Williams wrote:
> > > Gordon and all,
> > >
> > > As you know, pgMedia has filed an appeal.. So there is still an
> > > agrieved party.
> > >
> > > Gordon Cook wrote:
> > >
> > > > Someone asked: Why was NSI granted a two year extension to the
> > > > Cooperative Agreement without an open re-bid? The end of the
> > > > Cooperative
> > > > Agreement wasn't something that just snuck up and bit NTIA in the
> > > > bottom
> > > > and said "surprise!".
> > > >
> > > > Cook: NTIA wanted to rebid.
> > > >
> > > > NSF saw no need to rebid...... It *WAS* NSF's agreement. therefore
> > > > nothing
> > > > NTIA could do about it. By the time NTIA pryed it away from NSF, it
> > > > was
> > > > abit late.
> > > >
> > > > NTIA has not a shred of legally defensible authority to be doing what
> > > > it is
> > > > doing. I have triple sourced this. But to challenge NTIA now you need
> > > > a
> > > > legally agrieved party. With the PGMedia case now history we don't
> > > > presently have a legally aggrieved party. Damned shame. because NTIA
> > > > will
> > > > soon give ICANN the root and with the DNSO people calling all over
> > > > themselves to get ICANN to comply to their way of thinking they are
> > > > de-facto accepting ICANN legal authority and ensnaring themselves in
> > > > ICANN's clutches.
> > > >
> > > > we need an IODesign lawsuit. It cannot possibly happen too fast.
> > > >
> > > > ************************************************************************
> > > > ***
> > > > The COOK Report on Internet | New handbook just published:IP
> > > > Insur-
> > > > 431 Greenway Ave, Ewing, NJ 08618 USA| gency & Transformation of
> > > > Telecomm.See
> > > > (609) 882-2572 (phone & fax) |
> > > > http://cookreport.com/insurgency.html
> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Index to 7 years of COOK Report,
> > > > how
> > > > to
> > > > subscribe, exec summaries, special reports, gloss at
> > > > http://www.cookreport.com
> > > > ************************************************************************
> > > > ****
> > > > **
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > --
> > > Jeffrey A. Williams
> > > CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
> > > Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
> > > E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Contact Number: 972-447-1894
> > > Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
> >
> > ----------------------------------
> > E-Mail: William X. Walsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: 19-Mar-99
> > Time: 18:45:55
> > ----------------------------------
> > "We may well be on our way to a society overrun by hordes
> > of lawyers, hungry as locusts."
> > - Chief Justice Warren Burger, US Supreme Court, 1977
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Jeffrey A. Williams
> CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
> Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
> E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Contact Number: 972-447-1894
> Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
----------------------------------
E-Mail: William X. Walsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 19-Mar-99
Time: 19:56:18
----------------------------------
"We may well be on our way to a society overrun by hordes
of lawyers, hungry as locusts."
- Chief Justice Warren Burger, US Supreme Court, 1977
