Martin and all,
Martin B. Schwimmer wrote:
> Mr. Sondow wrote:
> >
> >If this process were really being done in a fair way, the INTA would have
> >sent you their proposal. Instead, they insert themselves by extra-procedural
> >means onto the drafting team of the DNSO.org and present their bylaws
> >proposals to a few people in the DNSO.org instead of at a meeting attended
> >by a large number of participants, in order to explout and usurp the name of
> >the DNSO.org for themselves.
>
> First off, I was invited to join the dnso drafting team at Monterrey and
> begged off because of work commitments in December, so INTA did not need to
> inert itself "by extra-procedural means."
However the INTA seemed to have accomplished to insert itself in an
more prominent position with DNSO.ORG at any rate.
>
>
> Second, if INTA had merely submitted a proposal to ICANN, I believe that
> the proposal would have been criticized for not representing the views of a
> consensus of stakeholders, and you and others would have accused INTA of
> attempting to subvert the consensus process. Instead, INTA has presented
> its proposal to the world, as have several other entities other than
> dnso.org (and just as ORSC, BWG, Ms. Hauben and of course, INEG) presented
> alternate ICANN proposals.
Yes the INTA has subverted the consensus process by the DNSO.ORG
allowing the INTA a more prominent position in the process by posting the INTA's
proposal on the DNSO.ORG Web page and not any other proposals.
see: http://www.dnso.org/docs/dnso-draft-inta-bylaws.html. So the FACTS seem
to belie your comments here Martin.
>
>
> Is there someone on the dnso or ifwp lists who does not have access to the
> INTA proposal and does not have these forums to present their opposing views?
No. However DNSO.ORG as I stated above has seen fit to allow for the
INTA to have "More equal status than others" for the INTA.
>
>
> In an enviroment where people on this list have referred to trademark
> interests as white slavers and I imagine INTA is under no illusions that it
> will "usurp" the dnso.org process.
The INTA has already in stark contrast to this comment "usurped" the
a reasonable and equal consensus process as it has a more prominent
place on the DNSO.ORG web page, as I indicted above.
>
>
> After all, Ms. Dyson's article on the Grateful Dead model of intellectual
> property management proves that she will never sell out the Internet to
> trademark interests.
If you really belie this Martin, I have an interest in a bridge in Brooklyn
Ny, I would like to interest you in. >;)
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> To receive the digest version instead, send a
> blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> To SUBSCRIBE forward this message to:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, forward this message to:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Problems/suggestions regarding this list? Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ___END____________________________________________
Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Contact Number: 972-447-1894
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
__________________________________________________
To receive the digest version instead, send a
blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To SUBSCRIBE forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNSUBSCRIBE, forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems/suggestions regarding this list? Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___END____________________________________________
